Politico-Legal Alberta Cartoons
[Français]
20a We need to promote more our oil sands, our Rockies and the originality of our non-policy on French language services.
35a I don't believe in Santa Claus !
35b I already told you that I do not believe in Santa Claus !
35c Him again !
35e As I wrote in July 2010, bilingualism in Canada is a federal construct ; it is not a legal or constitutional requirement.
35e.1
35f Yet, the Judge is right: our one hand clapping of language rights doesn’t produce much sound !
35f.1 Yet, the Judge...(bilingual version)
35g As everybody knows, in Alberta, it’s the English language which is threatened !
35h It’s evident that, in Alberta, the English language needs protection !
35i After the appointment of another unilingual judge to the highest Court of the land, it would be appropriate to propose a new name: the Royal Supreme Court of Canada.
35i.1 After the appointment... (bilingual version)
35j We should inform the A.G. of Ontario that it's not only B.C. who is facing French language recalcitrants and that we would be grateful should he decide to intervene in support of our position.
44a When one speaks French in a family, civil or criminal matter, it should be transcribed and not replaced by the notation «FOREIGN LANGUAGE SPOKEN».
44b When one speaks French in a family, civil or criminal matter, it should be transcribed and not replaced by the notation «FOREIGN LANGUAGE SPOKEN». (bilingual version)
44c When one speaks French in a family, civil or criminal matter, it should be transcribed and not replaced by the notation «OTHER LANGUAGE SPOKEN».
46 When one speaks French in Court, it should be transcribed and not replaced by the notation «OTHER LANGUAGE SPOKEN» or «FOREIGN LANGUAGE SPOKEN».
46a When one speaks English or French in Court, it should be transcribed and not replaced by the notation «OTHER LANGUAGE SPOKEN» or «FOREIGN LANGUAGE SPOKEN».
46b This year, I am asking for French forms. I would also like...
47.1 Maybe,...
48.1 Maybe, ...
51 The Alberta scales of justice: what should be the next statement of the Goddess of Justice ?
51a I repeat what I wrote in July 2010: bilingualism in Canada is a federal construct and is not a legal or constitutional requirement.
51b Sometimes, politics have reasons which even law cannot understand…
51c Pauline maintains French is threatened in America; me, I am sure that English is threatened in Alberta ...
51d Not only I have not disapproved the attorney who pleaded « No more rights are accorded or afforded someone who wants to speak French in Court than someone who wants to speak any other language » but I even named him judge.
51e If Manitoba could ignore court decisions on language rights for 95 years, Alberta should try to do the same !
51f As for the honour of the Crown...
51g) As the oil price per barrel…
51h) As you can see, I recognize a "nearly" equal status of English and French ...
51i) By coincidence, the regulation made to carry into effect the right of any person to use English or French before our courts brings some limits on the use of French...
51J) The regulation clearly conveys the message that one must think twice before using French...
51k) The Ministry does not anticipate an increased demand for French or bilingual proceedings as a result of this regulation.
51l) The Ministry does not anticipate an increased demand for French or bilingual proceedings as a result of this regulation. (bilingual version)
51l.1)
52. In praising Ralph Klein, I cannot forget to mention the creation of the Francophone Secretariat and of the French Language School Boards ...
53. Doctor! With my left ear, I don't hear French anymore and, with my right ear, I don't understand it anymore ...
53a) Doctor! I think I'm suffering from the Trafalgar complex !
Categories : Justice
Last Update : 2014-02-28
